Azaz Zaman, Ummahani Akter, Md. ImranTalukder
Abstract: Corporations in emerging economies are dominated by agency theory as a corporate governance mechanism. Due to several privatized firms’ ineffectiveness within emerging economies, this paper argues that other approaches or theories need to be tested as an alternative to agency theory. Thus, this article explores the relevance of stewardship theory in emerging economies as an alternative to agency theory. Extensive literature review and a questionnaire survey were done to investigate the applicability of stewardship theory in emerging nations. The convenience sampling technique was adopted as a means to collect primary data. A well- representative sample, which includes both corporate managers and academicians, was used to survey the questionnaire. Then, a simple OLS regression model has been used to investigate the impact. In this model, corporate governance has been used as a dependent variable and six critical socio-psychological factors of emerging markets have been used as independent variables. Results show that all the socio-psychological factors harm corporate governance, casting doubt on the stewardship theory’s appropriateness as a replacement of agency theory in emerging economies. Therefore, this paper argues that despite being substantially popular in advanced countries, stewardship theory is not a suitable alternative to agency theory in emerging nations.
Keywords: Stewardship Theory, Agency Theory, Corporate Governance, Emerging Markets, Bangladesh
References
Anderson, D. W., Melanson, S. J., & Maly, J. (2007). The Evolution of Corporate Governance: power redistribution brings boards to life. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 780-797.
Aram, J. D., & Salipante Jr, P. F. (2003). Bridging scholarship in management: Epistemological reflections. British journal of management, 14(3), 189-205.
Aycan, Z. (2002). Leadership and teamwork in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 7(2), 1.
Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’. Management Decision, 54(1), 174-193.
Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E. W., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: background and epistemology. Journal of Management History, 22(4), 437-449.
Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (2001). Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Wash. ULQ, 79, 403.
Brennan, M. J. (1995). Corporate finance over the past 25 years. Financial Management, 9-22.
Buchanan, A. (1996). Toward a theory of the ethics of bureaucratic organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 419-440.
Bundt, J. (2000). Strategic stewards: Managing accountability, building trust. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 757-778.
Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (2003). Asian approaches to human communication: A dialogue.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of management review, 28(3), 371-382.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic management journal, 19(3), 269-290.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of management review, 22(1), 20-47.
Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of management review, 15(3), 369-381.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Forsyth, J. A. (2016). Is Agency Theory incompatible with Stewardship Theory.
Franke, G. R. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
Gupta, V., Levenburg, N., Moore, L., Motwani, J., & Schwarz, T. (2009). Anglo vs. Asian family business: A cultural comparison and analysis. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 3(2), 46-55.
Harkness, J. (1975). KENNETH J. ARROW. The Limits of Organization. Pp. 86. New York: W.W. Norton, 1974. $4.95. Paperbound, $1.95. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 417(1), 185-187. doi: 10.1177/000271627541700157
Hernandez, M. (2007). Stewardship: Theoretical development and empirical test of its determinants. Duke University.
Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance: Cambridge University Press.
Islam, N. (2001). Democracy and governance in Pakistan’s fragmented society. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(12), 1335-1355.
Jaeger, A. M., & Kanungo, R. N. (1990). Management in developing countries: Routledge.
Jamilah, A. (1994). From Kampung to urban factories: Findings from the HAWA study: Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Kabasakal, H., & Dastmalchian, A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on leadership and culture in the Middle East.
Keay, A. (2015). Board accountability in corporate governance: Routledge.
Keay, A. (2017). Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1292-1314.
Keay, A., & Loughrey, J. (2015). The framework for board accountability in corporate governance. Legal Studies, 35(2), 252-279.
Khan, H. (2000). The Efficiency Implications of Corruption In (eds) Explaining Corruption Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
Khan, M. (2008). Governance and development: The perspective of growth-enhancing governance.
Kluvers, R., & Tippett, J. (2011). An exploration of stewardship theory in a Not-for-Profit organisation. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
McDonald, M. L., Westphal, J. D., & Graebner, M. E. (2008). What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic management journal, 29(11), 1155-1177.
Menard, S. (1995). An introduction to logistic regression diagnostics. Applied logistic regression analysis, 58-79.
Miller, J. L. (2002). The board as a monitor of organizational activity: The applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 429-450.
Mitchell, R., & Meacheam, D. (2011). Knowledge worker control: understanding via principal and agency theory. The Learning Organization, 18(2), 149-160.
Müller, C. (1993). Agency-Theorie und Informationsgehalt: der Beitrag des normativen Prinzipal-Agenten-Ansatzes zum Erkenntnisfortschritt der Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Univ., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft.
Myers, R. H., & Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (Vol. 2): Duxbury press Belmont, CA.
Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality: Duke University Press.
Pastoriza, D., & Ariño, M. A. (2008). When agents become stewards: Introducing learning in the stewardship theory. Paper presented at the 1st IESE Conference, “Humanizing the Firm & Management Profession”, Barcelona, IESE Business School.
Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British journal of management, 16, S5-S26.
Sarkar, J. (2009). Board independence & corporate governance in India: Recent trends & challenges ahead. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 576-592.
Sternberg, E. (2004). Corporate governance: Accountability in the marketplace (Vol. 147): Institute of Economic Affairs.
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of management review, 28(3), 397-415.
Tosi, H. L., Brownlee, A. L., Silva, P., & Katz, J. P. (2003). An empirical exploration of decision-making under agency controls and stewardship structure. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2053-2071.
Trimarchi, M. (2008). Transnational Network Underpinnings of Hong Kong Family Businesses Culturally Sensitive Models of Family Business in Confucian Asia-A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm (pp. 119-139): ICFAI University Press.
Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 32(6), 1035-1054.
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1998). Toward a behavioral theory of the CEO/board relationship: How research can enhance our understanding of corporate governance practices Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation (pp. 256-277).